FORBES.com, GoogleNews.com, by Meghan Casserly, September 27, 2011 — For a growing number of professional women, food issues take center stage mid-life.
When coworkers would pop into Alison’s office at lunchtime to ask if she wanted take-out, the petite advertising executive would look up from the piles of papers on her desk and say sure, and ask for a turkey on rye. But instead of being eaten, the sandwich would be slipped away in a desk drawer until quitting time, and eventually make its way into the hands of her husband. “It’s extra,” she’d tell him nonchalantly. As if no one suspected a thing.
In reality, Alisonwasn’t eating anything at all. The 49-year old married Chicagoan was in the thralls of an on-and-off lifelong battle with anorexia that she could trace back to middle school. And everyone around her knew she was self-destructing—everyone except herself.
Not Your Daughter’s Eating Disorder
Eating disorders including anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa and more recently orthorexia have long been associated with body-conscious teenage girls. In recent years, however, treatment centers have seen a significant uptick in the number of women seeking treatment later in life—from 30s to 60s. The Renfrew Center, the country’s first and largest residential treatment network has reported an increase of over 42% in the past five years.
Now three years out of treatment, Alison is among the growing cohort of middle-aged professional women who have struggled with the painful and life-threatening condition. Once a self-professed “huge perfectionist” over-achiever (“I was in the office until the lights were turned out”), Alison left her planned career path for the slower pace of non-profit work upon completing treatment in 2008, something experts say that’s not uncommon. For patients, treatment centers and psychiatrists are able to pinpoint significant stress triggers that serve as catalysts for the dangerous disease. Not surprisingly, career can be at the top of the list.
Holly Grishkat, Ph.D., is the director of The Renfrew Center in Radnor, Penn., where she specializes in mid-life eating disorders and has seen career anxiety as one of several stress triggers that plague older women. But like most issues for working women, it’s not just the job, but the “juggle” that causes untold amounts of stress.
The Quest For Control
“It can be a high pressure job situation with a divorce, an illness, a child leaving home,” says Grishkat, listing the litany of life change that strike mid-life. “It could be work and an aging parent. For this age group there’s a lot of anxiety to ‘keep it together.’ They’re grappling for something to hold onto. For many, the eating disorder is something they have complete control over in an otherwise out-of-control time.”
“To this day when I feel my stress levels go up, my first thought is how to restrict [my diet],” says Karen, a 40-year-old human resource professional in a Texas-based financial firm. Out of treatment just three months, Karen is struggling with her health in the wake of severe anorexia that left her with biting stomach ulcers and an inability to have children. In three months she has been admitted back into the hospital on six occasions for medical problems related to the disease. “I’m on the right path,” she says of her recovery, but the behavioral pattern is hard to fight. “The minute stress hits me my first focus is how can I restrict? How quickly can I binge and purge?”
Like Alison, Karen’s life was career focused. “I have always been the first to volunteer for extremely stressful projects,” she says, “even to the point of making up projects so that I could immerse myself in work.” Similarly, she had struggled with food as a teen but never been diagnosed with an eating disorder until her 40s; experts agree that it’s rare for these conditions to make their first appearance in middle age. “Maybe they had body image issues when they were young, but it’s exacerbated by a stress later in life says Melissa Pennington Ph.D., the medical director of eating disorders at Texas Presbyterian Hospital.
When Karen’s husband became ill in 2008, she says she began grasping at straws, and food was her first attempt at control. As her weight began to drop dramatically, she continued to restrict, even in front of coworkers. “If I’ve eaten 25 cashews a day” she remembers thinking, “I’ve eaten.” An obsession with drinking water (15 to 20 16-ounce bottles during a workday) landed her in the emergency room where she learned she had flushed her system of all nutrients.
She eventually lost close to 100 lbs and was so weakened by a bout with bacterial pneumonia that she lost consciousness and awoke days later, intubated and hospitalized, suffering from nutrition-related seizures. “A month later I was finally able to accept that I need help.” It wasn’t until several weeks into treatment that she had the realization that would save her life. “We did an exercise where you had to spend a whole day in your bathing suit,” she recalls. “You had to stand in a 360 degree mirror and then draw what you saw. I started to cry—what have I done to myself? What have I allowed to take control of me?” For the first time Karen accepted that in her quest for control—to control her diet—she had in fact relinquished control of her own life to a vicious disease that was hell-bent on killing her.
Admitting Defeat—And Asking for Help
Both Karen and Alison attest that asking for help was the most difficult thing they had ever done. “Especially in the finance world, in an office full of Type-A men, I never wanted to come across as weak,” Alison says. Rehabilitation experts concede that for older patients, admitting defeat and asking for help can be a major roadblock—but it can ultimately be their saving grace.
Unlike young patients who are generally brought in by concerned parents, most adult patients come in of their own volition. Whether as the result of a health crisis or simply a conscious decision that they are risking their lives, there’s generally a motivation among the older set, says Dr. Ira Sacker, a leading authority in eating disorder treatment in the U.S. “There’s much less denial.”
“The most difficult thing for a woman my age to do is to ask for help,” says Alison, who admits that in addition to the control aspect of her eating disorder she also struggled with body image issues about aging. “Someone would tell me, ‘60 is the new 30.’ And what I would hear was ‘When you’re 60, you’d better look 30.’” In the advertising industry where she worked at the height of her disordered eating, the fast-pace of technology and turnaround of employees left her self-conscious of her capability and appearance compared with younger female colleagues. “It was a recipe for disaster for me,” she says of her decision to leave advertising for the non-profit world. “Much as it took everything in my soul to say I needed help, it was horrifically difficult to look at my career and say ‘I can’t do this anymore.’”
In the three months Alison spent in treatment at The Renfrew Center—crying through meals, spending three weeks in a wheelchair because she was too weak to walk–she says the biggest struggle was learning a new way to identify. “I realized the business cards, career, status—all those things are second to my life. I used to equate my job title with my value and my worth an in conjunction with my eating disorder it was killing me. Three years later when people ask me ‘What do you do?’ it takes everything I’ve got not to answer ‘I live my life.’” Alison’s new career revolves around mentoring and support for other women struggling with eating disorders and addiction—another affliction she has overcome.
Karen has years to go until she reaches Alison’s level of recovery. Just three months out of an inpatient program, she’s still weighing her employment options while battling through daily reminders of her lowest times—force ulcers recently ruptured, making her home look “like a crime scene” and the occasional fall has left her prone to concussions in her still-weakened state. But by sticking to her doctor-prescribed meal plan she sees light at the end of the tunnel for both herself, physically and mentally. “I’m not 20, I can’t just bounce back. But every day I’m stronger. I may weigh less than my German Shepherd,” she laughs, “But I’m getting there.”
Far From Any Lab, Paper Bits Find Illness
Todd Heisler/The New York Times
BIG DEAL A nonprofit company produces diagnostic tests the size of a stamp.
By Todd Heisler, Nancy Donaldson, Soo-Jeong Kang, Lisa Iaboni and Nick Harbaugh — Small Fixes: Paper Diagnostics: Donald G. McNeil Jr., a science reporter for The New York Times explains a liver damage test that fits on a postage stamp and could cost less than a penny.
The New York Times, by Donald G. McNeil Jr, September 27, 2011, BOSTON — While other scientists successfully shrank beakers, tubes and centrifuges into diagnostic laboratories that fit into aluminum boxes that cost $50,000, George Whitesides had smaller dreams.
Todd Heisler/The New York Times
The diagnostic tests designed in Dr. Whitesides’s Harvard University chemistry laboratory fit on a postage stamp and cost less than a penny.
His secret? Paper.
His colleagues miniaturized diagnostic tests so they could move into the field with tiny pumps and thread-thin tubes. Dr. Whitesides opted for a more novel approach, reasoning that a drop of blood or urine could wick its way through a square of filter paper without any help.
And if the paper could be etched with tiny channels so that the drop followed a path, and if that path were mined with dried proteins and chemically triggered dyes, the thumbnail-size square could be a mini-laboratory — one that could be run off by the thousands on a Xerox machine.
Diagnostics for All, the private company Dr. Whitesides founded four years ago here in Boston’s Brighton neighborhood to commercialize his inspirations, has already created such a test for liver damage.
It requires a single drop of blood, takes 15 minutes and can be read by an untrained eye: If a round spot the size of a sesame seed on the paper changes to pink from purple, the patient is probably in danger.
Using paper in diagnostic tests is not entirely new. It soaks up urine in home pregnancy kits and blood in home diabetes kits. But Dr. Whitesides has patented ways to control the flow through multiple layers for ever-more-complex diagnoses. His test has proved more than 90 percent accurate on blood samples previously screened by the laboratory of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, a Harvard teaching hospital, said Una S. Ryan, chief executive of Diagnostics for All.
“They should be even more accurate on fresh blood,” added Dr. Ryan, a biologist. Field tests in India are set for later this year.
The initial target audience is AIDS patients with tuberculosis who must take powerful cocktails of seven or more drugs.
Some drugs damage the liver, and deaths from liver failure are 12 times as common among African AIDS patients as among American ones, Dr. Ryan said, because current liver tests are expensive and require tubes of blood.
The paper test was developed with a $10 million grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.The foundation and the British government just donated $3 million toward creating three more paper tests to help small farmers. One is for aflatoxin, a poison produced by mold that grows on corn, peanuts and other crops. A large dose can lead to liver cancer, but even small amounts eaten regularly can leave children stunted. Farmers who can prove their crops are mold-free can protect their families and get higher prices. But current tests cost $6 each, far more than farmers can afford. A paper test that works on water washed over the grain could be made for as little as 50 cents, Dr. Ryan estimated. Volume production could drive the cost down to pennies.
The second test checks for milk spoilage caused by bacteria. Many small dairy farmers belong to cooperatives in which they pool their milk, and one sick cow can contaminate a whole batch.
The current test detects just the acidity caused by the bacteria, which is not very specific and can be defeated by adding a base like lime. A cheap enough test would help the cooperative find the offending farmer, and the farmer find the diseased cow.
The third proposed test detects hormones released into the urine when a cow is pregnant. Currently, farmers have to either watch their cows for behavior changes or perform physical exams that can be dangerous because they require reaching deep into the cow’s rectum to palpate the uterus.
“Raising cows is how farmers build wealth,” said Patrick Beattie, head of global health operations at Diagnostics for All. “They need better tests.”
The company’s office here is nothing fancy. The space is sublet from a nanotechnology company in an office park where pride of place belongs to an Acura dealership. Half the lab is piled with high-tech junk abandoned by a previous tenant.
And for all the elegance of the thinking that went into them, the tests themselves are produced in a remarkably low-tech, low-cost fashion. A sheet of filter paper, cut by hand, is fed into an $800 Xerox office printer that uses melted black wax instead of toner. Exactly 132 tests, resembling big shirt buttons, fit on an 8 ½-by-11-inch sheet.
The sheet is then placed for a few seconds into a heating box — one executive called it “our $5,000 Easy-Bake oven” — to melt the wax deeper into the paper, creating the channels.
(Originally, Dr. Whitesides used a plastic that hardened in ultraviolet light, but wax is cheaper and faster.)
Reagents are spotted on by hand with a pipette — a tedious job, but the $100,000 machine that can automate it is not in the budget, Dr. Ryan said. Then the paper “buttons” are cut out by a computer-driven scalpel.
Multiple layers are made this way, then glued into a sandwich and laminated.
Finally, each batch is sealed into a foil envelope to keep out moisture and sunlight.
In an interview in his office in Harvard’s main chemistry building, Dr. Whitesides described the origins of his idea.
Because cost was less of an issue for the military, expensive polymers could be used.
“But that was too expensive for the developing world,” he said, “so I was thinking, ‘What’s the minimum-cost way of making patterns, of putting things into test zones?’ And what came to mind was newspapers and comic books. And that led to these paper diagnostics.”
Dr. Whitesides sees many possible advances. The liver-function test uses chemistry. The next generation will use immunology — for example, one design has dried antibodies attached to bits of paint that drift over a surface to which other antibodies are fixed. The paint making it through gives the color reaction.
After that, he plans to build something like the battery-powered glucose meter used by diabetics, but on a disposable chip, employing flexible circuits printed with metal-infused ink and light-emitting diodes less than a millimeter across.
He also envisions a chip that will count how many cells in a drop of blood have malaria parasites inside.
Multiplying DNA, a key part of tests for viruses, is a bigger obstacle, since that usually requires repeated heating and cooling.
“I don’t see us doing sequencing,” he said. “That’s still going to be done in an aluminum box. But we’re still a long way from getting to the end of what’s inventable.”
For now, Dr. Whitesides is eager to see his inventions prove their usefulness in the real world.
“I’m going to breathe a sigh of relief when somebody says, ‘We’ve used up the first 10,000 in our clinic, and we think they’re absolutely terrific. Send us another 50,000.’ ”
Eventually, Dr. Ryan explained, the goal is for Diagnostics for All, which is nonprofit, to wean itself off grant money by licensing its chip technology to commercial companies.
For example, she said, marathon runners might be able to touch a chip to their sweaty foreheads to see if their electrolytes are still in balance before they drink more water. Or Americans with high cholesterol taking statins, which can also cause liver damage, might routinely monitor their liver enzymes with a finger prick.
Markets like those could give the company an income stream that would go a long way toward supporting its research in Africa, Dr. Ryan said.
“Although,” she added, “there will be huge pushback from the lab companies, because that’s their bread and butter.”
‘POSTAGE STAMP’ LIVER TEST
Dr. George Whitesides’s paper diagnostic test assesses the level of aspartate transaminase in the blood. The enzyme, better known as AST, is released when liver cells break down.
1. A drop of blood is touched to the back of the square of paper. It first seeps through a membrane with pores that block the large red and white blood cells, letting through only the clear plasma.
2. The next layer contains two dried chemicals, one of which is cysteine sulfinic acid, which is chemically similar to aspartate, the amino acid that AST normally binds to. (These chemicals are available from lab supply houses.)
3. If AST is present, it binds to the two chemicals, causing a reaction that ultimately releases sulfite ions, SO3.
4. The next layer contains a methyl dye that is normally blue but turns colorless when sulfites attach to it. It is printed over a pink background, so the spot looks purple. If the layer changes to light pink, the blood contains dangerous levels of AST.
The World Economic Forum
The World Economic Forum is an independent international organization committed to improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas.
The World Economic Forum encourages businesses, governments and civil society to commit together to improving the state of the world. Our Strategic and Industry Partners are instrumental in helping stakeholders meet key challenges such as building sustained economic growth, mitigating global risks, promoting health for all, improving social welfare and fostering environmental sustainability.
A key part of the Forum’s activities is the creation of distinctive communities of Member and Partner companies as well as leaders from civil society for more informal opportunities for interaction.
The Strategic Partners community comprises a select group of 100 leading global companies representing diverse regions and industries selected for their alignment with the Forum’s commitment to improving the state of the world. These Partners believe in the power of multistakeholder interaction to drive positive change and work closely with the Forum to help shape the industry, regional and global agendas.
Industry Partners are select Member companies of the World Economic Forum that are actively involved in the Forum’s mission at the industry level. With privileged access to the Forum’s multistakeholder networks and experts, partnership brings visibility and insight to strategic decision-making on the most important industry and cross-industry related issues. This access and insight allows Industry Partners to help lead positive change across the issues and engage in action to support corporate global citizenship.
The World Economic Forum’s 1,000 Foundation Member companies are at the heart of all the Forum’s activities and their support is essential in helping find truly sustainable and global solutions to improve the state of the world. The typical Member company is a global enterprise ranking among the top companies within their industry and/or country. Member companies play a leading role in shaping the future of their industry and/or region and, as such, are recognized among their peers and in the broader public as one of the world’s leading companies.
The Global Shapers Community will provide youth with a global platform to shape the future – integrating the personal, community and global dimension. Through the unparalleled convening power of the World Economic Forum, the Global Shapers Community is diverse in demographics, geographical areas and sectors. However, it is united by a common desire to channel the members’ tremendous energy and enthusiasm into building a more peaceful and inclusive world.
The World Economic Forum’s Community of Global Growth Companies (GGC) was formed in 2007 to engage dynamic high-growth companies with the potential to be tomorrow’s industry leaders and to become a driving force of economic and social change. As of August 2011, 315 companies from over 60 countries had been admitted to the GGC Community.
The Risk Response Network (RRN) was launched in 2011 to provide private and public sector leadership with an independent platform to better monitor, prepare for, respond to and mitigate global and systemic risks. A unique, exclusive and trusted community, the RRN is strategically positioned to respond to a continuously evolving risk landscape by leveraging the World Economic Forum’s knowledge base, experience-sharing and stakeholder approach.
The World Economic Forum’s Technology Pioneers programme recognizes companies, normally in a start-up phase, from around the world that are involved in the design, development and deployment of new technologies, and hold promise of significantly impacting the way business and society operate.Technology Pioneers must demonstrate visionary leadership and show signs of being long-standing market leaders – their technology must be proven. Each year, hundreds of innovative companies from around the world are reviewed, with approximately 30 selected as Technology Pioneers in the following three categories: Information Technologies and New Media, Energy and Environment, Life Sciences and Health.
Social entrepreneurs drive social innovation and transformation in fields such as education, health, environment and enterprise development. They pursue poverty alleviation goals with entrepreneurial zeal, business methods and the courage to innovate and overcome traditional practices.
The Forum of Young Global Leaders is a multistakeholder community of exceptional young leaders who share a commitment to shaping the global future. Each year, the World Economic Forum identifies 200-300 extraordinary individuals worldwide. Together, they form a powerful international community that can dramatically impact the global future.
The Network of Global Agenda Councils study the foremost topics in the global arena. The Network of Global Agenda Councils consists of select, invitation-only groups on the key topics in the global arena. Each Council, comprised of 15-20 Members, serves as an advisory board to the Forum and other interested parties, such as governments and international organizations.
Through the Women Leaders and Gender Parity Programme, the World Economic Forum is committed to promoting women’s leadership and closing global gender gaps. The programme strives to increase the participation of women in the Forum’s activities by ensuring their involvement as members in communities and inviting women leaders to be active contributors to the global dialogue.
The Global University Leaders Forum (GULF) is a community of leading university presidents. The community fosters collaboration between top universities in areas of significance for global policy and helps shape the agenda of the World Economic Forum.
What is Global Competitiveness?
The World Economic Forum’s Center for Global Competitiveness and Performance through its Global Competitiveness Report and report series, aims to mirror the business operating environment and competitiveness of over 140 economies worldwide. The report series identify advantages as well as impediments to national growth thereby offering a unique benchmarking tool to the public and private sectors as well as academia and civil society. The Center works with a network of Partner Institutes as well as leading academics worldwide to ensure the latest thinking and research on global competitiveness are incorporated into its reports.
The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012, comes out amid multiple challenges to the global economy and a continuing shift in the balance of economic activity away from advanced economies and toward emerging markets. Policymakers are struggling to find ways to manage the present economic challenges while preparing their economies to perform well in an increasingly complex global landscape and the report offers a unique tool in addressing some key issues.
This year’s report findings show that Switzerland tops the overall rankings. Singapore overtakes Sweden for second position. Northern and Western European countries dominate the top 10 with Sweden (3rd), Finland (4th), Germany (6th), the Netherlands (7th), Denmark (8th) and the United Kingdom (10th). Japan remains the second-ranked Asian economy at 9th place, despite falling three places since last year.
The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012
Switzerland tops the overall rankings in The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012. Singapore overtakes Sweden for second position. Northern and Western European countries dominate the top 10 with Sweden (3rd), Finland (4th), Germany (6th), the Netherlands (7th), Denmark (8th) and the United Kingdom (10th). Japan remains the second-ranked Asian economy at 9th place, despite falling three places since last year.
The United States continues its decline for the third year in a row, falling one more place to fifth position. In addition to the macroeconomic vulnerabilities that continue to build, some aspects of the United States’ institutional environment continue to raise concern among business leaders, particularly related to low public trust in politicians and concerns about government inefficiency. On a more positive note, banks and financial institutions are rebounding for the first time since the financial crisis and are assessed as somewhat sounder and more efficient.
Germany maintains a strong position within the Eurozone, although it goes down one position to sixth place, while the Netherlands (7th) improves by one position in the rankings, France drops three places to 18th, and Greece continues its downward trend to 90th. Competitiveness-enhancing reforms will play a key role in revitalizing growth in the region and tackling its key challenges, fiscal consolidation and persistent unemployment.
The results show that while competitiveness in advanced economies has stagnated over the past seven years, in many emerging markets it has improved, placing their growth on a more stable footing and mirroring the shift in economic activity from advanced to emerging economies.
The People’s Republic of China (26th) continues to lead the way among large developing economies, improving by one more place and solidifying its position among the top 30. Among the four other BRICS economies, South Africa (50th) and Brazil (53rd) move upwards while India (56th) and Russia (66th) experience small declines. Several Asian economies perform strongly, with Japan (9th) and Hong Kong SAR (11th) also in the top 20.
The New Sustainability Champions
Meet the Technology Pioneers 2012: Innovating to Transform Society
- World Economic Forum selects 25 Technology Pioneers, visionary companies in the fields of information technology and new media, energy/environment and life sciences/health
- Technology Pioneers 2012 includes some of the world’s most innovative young companies whose cutting-edge technologies are transforming business and society
- Read their profiles or download the report at http://www.weforum.org/techpioneers
Geneva, Switzerland, 1 September 2011 – The World Economic Forum today announced its new class of Technology Pioneers, comprised of 25 of the most innovative technology start-ups from around the world. These companies represent the latest generation of innovation and are poised to have a critical impact on how business and society work.
The Technology Pioneers 2012 will be recognized for their work at the Annual Meeting of the New Champions in Dalian, People’s Republic of China, from 14 to 16 September 2011.
The Technology Pioneers 2012 are drawn from the fields of information technology and new media, energy and environment, and life sciences and health where they are active in a variety of areas, illustrating the broad range of impact they have on the world. Among their many diverse activities are drip irrigation on small farms to high-precision greenhouse-gas measurement; providing financial services to underserved, rural populations; and developing photosynthetic biofuels or molecular diagnostics.
“One particular aspect to highlight this year is the large number of companies that are focusing on having a social impact, such as providing health or financial services to underserved populations, while revolutionizing the business paradigms in their industries,” said Olivier Schwab, Director, Head of Technology Pioneers, World Economic Forum. “This year’s companies showcase the diversity in which innovative technology can be deployed to benefit business and society.”
The selected companies are (in alphabetical order): 1366 Technologies, Altobridge, Appirio, Attero Recycling, Biocartis, CloudFlare, Diagnostics For All, DoubleVerify, Driptech, Dropbox, EcoMotors International, Electro Power Systems, Financial Inclusion Network and Operations, First Energy, Joule Unlimited, Kickstarter, Lending Club, Living PlanIT, Mocana, Palantir Technologies, Picarro, Protean Electric, Solazyme, Tabula Digita and Tethys BioScience.
For further information on the Technology Pioneers 2012, please visit http://www.weforum.org/techpioneers.
The identification of the Technology Pioneer companies is the result of a rigorous selection process for which the Forum received hundreds of applications from around the world and that were evaluated by over 50 global technology experts. The selection committee includes leading academics, journalists, technologists and venture capitalists.
Since 2000, the World Economic Forum has recognized the work of young companies who hold the promise of significantly transforming the way business and society operate. More than 400 innovative companies from five continents have been selected as Technology Pioneers. Among them, approximately 60% are still independent and 20% have been acquired by industry leaders. Previous Technology Pioneers include Monitise (2006), Mozilla Corporation (2007), Nanosolar (2007), Gridpoint (2008), Mint.com (2009), BloomEnergy (2010), Takadu (2011) and NetQin (2011).
Technology Pioneers are selected on a yearly basis. Candidate companies are nominated by Members, constituents and collaborators of the World Economic Forum, as well as by the larger public. A selection committee, comprised of top technology and innovation experts from around the world, reviews all candidate companies and makes a recommendation to the World Economic Forum, which then takes the final decision.
Bloomberg TV, Innovators: Medicine. Diagnostics For All explains how we create our patterned-paper liver function tests and how they can be used to improve health in developing countries. Three companies are featured; DFA’s portion can be found here, or the entire episode can be watched here. (The segment on DFA begins at 0:07:08) Play »
March / April 2009
Technology Review, “TR10: Paper Diagnostics: George Whitesides explains how diagnostic paper chips could revolutionize health care in disparate places.” Play »
March / April 2009
Technology Review, “Making Paper Diagnostic Tests: The paper diagnostic chips are made in a few steps, shown here by graduate student Andres Martinez, a member of the Whitesides Research Group.” Play »
December 22, 2008
Charlie Rose, “An hour with Bill Gates” (roughly 26 minutes into the program) Play »
June 20, 2008
NYSE Euronext, “Diagnostics For All visits the NYSE to celebrate its unprecedented win of both the Harvard Business School and MIT Business Plan Competitions.” Play »
© 2011 Diagnostics For All